Yin and Yang in Teaching English: An Overview of Gender-based Techniques

Autor

  • Tamara Goncharova Kazimierz Wielki University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34864/heteroglossia.issn.2084-1302.nr19.art3

Słowa kluczowe:

gender, gender-based techniques, learning strategies, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning

Abstrakt

The aim of the paper is to highlight some gender differences, which justify the necessity to use different techniques for boys and girls in teaching a foreign language. Over the past decades, various correlations, such as gender and achievement, gender and cognitive abilities, gender and learning styles or gender and techniques, received considerable attention. Many scholars came to the conclusion that the relationship between gender and second language success is affected by a series of factors making boys’ and girls’ performance different. Male students are more interested in games and exercises that involve the use of flashcards; they pay attention to the visual context, and simultaneously make use of their tactile preferences. Males’ reasoning seems to be more general and deductive. They often employ memory strategies connected with physical response. As for female students, they are very keen to participate in the lesson with a song or a role play, in which they have a chance to practice their skills. Research findings indicate that girls prefer inductive reasoning, in which they use a great number of examples. When teachers are familiar with the number of difficulties their students may encounter, they are able to teach them effective strategies. Thanks to the fact that teachers are becoming more and more attentive to gender problems, every student in the classroom may have more opportunities to succeed in second language learning.

Bibliografia

BACON, S. M., FINNEMANN, M. D., 1992, Sex Differences in Self-Reported Beliefs about Foreign-Language Learning and Authentic Oral and Written Input, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01041.x.

BANGERT-DROWNS, R. L., KULIK, J. A., & KULIK, C., 1985, Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools, “Journal of Computer-Based Instruction”, 12(3), p. 59–68.

BONOMO, V., 2010, Gender Matters in Elementary Education. Research-Based Strategies to Meet the Distinctive Learning Needs of Boys and Girls, “Educational Horizons”, 4, p. 257-264.

CAPLAN, P.J. et al., 1997, Gender Differences in Human Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

EINSTEIN, G., 2007, Dimorphisms and cognition [in:] Einstein, G. (ed.), Sex and the Brain. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

FULLER, A., 2014, Teaching Boys, http://andrewfuller.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Teaching-Boys.pdf.

FULLER, A., 2014, Teaching Girls, http://andrewfuller.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Teaching-Girls.pdf.

GORDON, T., 2007, Teaching Young Children a Second Language. Westport: Preager Publisher.

GUISO, L., SAPIENZA, P. and ZINGALES, L., 2006, Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? ”The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 20 (2), p. 23–48.

GURIAN, M., STEVENS, K., 2004, With boys and girls in mind. “Educational Leadership”, 62,p. 21-26.

GURIAN, M., STEVENS, K., KING, K., 2008, Strategies for Teaching Boys and Girls – Elementary Level. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.

GURIAN, M., HANLEY, P., 2011, Boys and Girls Learn Differently: A Guide for Teachers and Parents. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.HALPERN, D.F., 2012, Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. New York: Psychology Press.

HYDE, J. S., 2005, The gender similarities hypothesis, ”American Psychologist”, 60 (6), p. 581–592, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

JACKSON, D.N., RUSHTON, J.P., 2008, Males have greater g: Sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test, ”Intelligence”, 34(5), p. 479-486.

JENSEN, E., 2001, Arts with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for the Supervision of Curriculum Development.

KIMURA, M., 2012, The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MAYO, M., LECUMBERRI, M., 2004, Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

MCBRIDE, B., 2009, Girls will be Girls and Boys will be Boys. Teaching to Gender Differences, http://crr.math.arizona.edu/GenderKeynote.pdf.

MOTTERAM, G., 2013, Developing and extending our understanding of language learning and technology. Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. London: British Council.

NICHOLSON, K. G., KIMURA, D., 1996, Sex differences for speech and manual skill. ”Perceptual and Motor Skills”, 82 (1), p. 3–13, https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.3.

POLITZER, R., 1983, An Exploratory Study of Self Reported Language Learning Behaviors and Their Relation to Achievement. “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, 6, p. 54-68.

SAX, L., 2005, Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday.

SCHNEIDER, A., 2013, How Boys’ Learning Styles Differ (and How We Can Support Them), http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/how-boys-learning-styles-differ-0211134.

SILVERMAN, I. & EALS, M., 1992, Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data [in:] Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, p. 533–549. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SOKAL, L. & KATZ, H., 2008, Effects of Technology and Male Teachers on Boys’ Reading. “Australian Journal of Education”, 52, p. 81-94.

SPELKE, S., 2013, Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. ”American psychologist”, 60 (9), p. 950-958.

TEESE, R., 1995, Who wins at school? Boys and Girls in Australian Secondary Education. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.

Opublikowane

2025-11-25

Numer

Dział

Językoznawstwo

Jak cytować

Yin and Yang in Teaching English: An Overview of Gender-based Techniques. (2025). Heteroglossia – Studia Kulturoznawczo-Filologiczne, 19, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.34864/heteroglossia.issn.2084-1302.nr19.art3