Approaches and Methods in the Modern CDA

Autor

  • Piotr Cap University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2016.06.04

Słowa kluczowe:

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA); interdisciplinarity; pragmatics; cognitive linguistics; legitimization-proximization model

Abstrakt

This article gives an overview of the theoretical underpinnings and current work in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). It defines CDA as a transdisciplinary, text-analytical approach to critical social research, aimed at revealing the power imbalance reflected in the use of language and patterns of dominance imposed through the use of language. Describing the most important schools and models in CDA, the article demonstrates how critical approaches draw on recent developments in different areas of linguistics, such as pragmatics, cognitive linguistics and corpus studies. At the same time, it shows how the interdisciplinary research agenda of CDA attracts the ‘classic’ theories and tools of linguistics to new empirical territories in political/public discourse. The final part of the article illustrates the explanatory power the legitimization-proximization model in CDA in a case study of the discourse of the war-onterror.

Bibliografia

Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage (eds.). 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bacevich, Andrew. 2010. Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Baker, Paul and Anthony McEnery. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics 4: 197-226.

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Anthony McEnery and Ruth Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19: 273-306.

Bhatia, Vijay. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.

Billig, Michael. 2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization. Discourse & Society 19: 783-800.

Blommaert, Jan. 2001. Context is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology 21: 13-32.

Breeze, Ruth. 2011. Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics 21: 493-525.

Bublitz, Wolfram, Andreas H. Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider. 2011. Preface to the handbook series. In: Wolfram Bublitz and Neal Norrick (eds.), Handbooks of Pragmatics, vol. 1: Foundations of Pragmatics, v-vii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17-41.

Cap, Piotr. 2010. Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392-407.

Cap, Piotr. 2011. Micropragmatics and macropragmatics. In: Wolfram Bublitz and Neal Norrick (eds.), Handbooks of Pragmatics, vol. 1: Foundations of Pragmatics, 51-75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cap, Piotr. 2016. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Cap, Piotr and Urszula Okulska (eds.). 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Chilton, Paul. 2005. Missing links in mainstream CDA: modules, blends and the critical instinct. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, 19-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chilton, Paul. 2011a. Still something missing in CDA. Discourse Studies 13: 769-81.

Opublikowane

2016-11-10

Numer

Dział

Językoznawstwo

Jak cytować

Approaches and Methods in the Modern CDA. (2016). Heteroglossia – Studia Kulturoznawczo-Filologiczne, 6, 41-63. https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2016.06.04