Text, Discourse, Function: Ways into Pragmatics for Philology students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2016.06.05Słowa kluczowe:
pragmatics, micro-pragmatics, macro-pragmatics, text, discourse, functionAbstrakt
Defining pragmatics by its general perspective, rather than by its specific object of investigation, entails looking at the scope of pragmatics in terms of micro- and macro-level concepts. These have been traditionally associated with the opposition between the analysis of speech act force at an utterance level and the analysis of global intentionality at the level of a discourse/text. Following this division, as well as its later refinements, the article will, first, review the different constituents of force of an utterance, relating them to pragmatic concepts which characterize the process of encoding and decoding its message (deixis, presupposition, implicature, etc.). Second, it will demonstrate how individual utterances comprising different sets of constituents and markers of force form sequences to shape the global intentionality of a discourse/text.
Bibliografia
Alston, William. 1994. Illocutionary acts and linguistic meaning. In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, 29-49. London: Routledge.
Atlas, Jay. 2004. Presupposition. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, 29-52. Oxford: Blackwell.
Attardo, Salvatore. 1990. The violation of Grice’s maxims in jokes. In K. Hall, M. Meacham & R. Shapiro (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 355-362. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Attardo, Salvatore. 1993. Violation in conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 532-558.
Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austin, John. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-66.
Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Sentences. Stanford: CSLI.
Bertolet, Rod. 1994. Are there indirect speech acts? In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, 335-49. London: Routledge.
Bezuidenhout, Anne. 1997. Pragmatics, semantic underdetermination and the referential/ attributive distinction. Mind 106: 375-409.
Bezuidenhout, Anne. 2002. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105-134.
Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17-41.
Cole, Peter (ed.). 1978. Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. London: Academic Press.
Davis, Wayne. 1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Elugardo, Reinaldo and Robert Stainton. 2004. Shorthand, syntactic ellipsis, and the pragmatic determinants of what is said. Mind and Language 19: 442-71.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fillmore, Charles. 1997. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford: CSLI.
Grundy, Peter. 1995. Doing Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
Holdcroft, David. 1994. Indirect speech acts and propositional content. In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, 350-64. London: Routledge.
Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 11-42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Horn, Laurence. 1996. Presupposition and implicature. In S. Lappin (ed.) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 299-320. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horn, Laurence and Gregory Ward. 2004. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 2004. Deixis and pragmatics. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, 97-121. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manning, Paul. 2001. On social deixis. Anthropological Linguistics 43: 54-100.
Marmaridou, Sophia. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 1-44.
Ramallo, Fernando, Anxo M. Lorenzo-Suarez, Xoan Paulo Rodriguez-Yanez & Piotr Cap (eds.). 2009. New Approaches to Discourse and Business Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Recanati, Francois. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
Recanati, Francois. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91.
Recanati, Francois. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadock, Jerrold. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 281-98. London: Academic Press.
Searle, John. 1975. A taxonomy of speech acts. In K. Gunderson (ed.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: 344-69.
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soames, Scott. 1989. Presupposition. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 553-616. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-57.
Ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tsohatzidis, Savas (ed.). 1994. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, Teun. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.
Van Dijk, Teun. 1980. Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, Teun. 1995. Discourse, semantics and ideology. Discourse and Society 6: 243-59.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2002. Ideology: Political discourse and cognition. In P. Chilton & C. Schaeffner (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk, 33-57. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, Teun and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
Wodak, Ruth and Paul Chilton (eds.). 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
