Constructing Governance in the Modern Poland: A Cognitive-Critical Perspective on Coercion and Legitimization in State Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34864/heteroglossia.issn.2084-1302.nr17.art13Słowa kluczowe:
leadership discourse – discursive legitimization – populist style – threat construction – conflict and crisis – parliamentary electionsAbstrakt
The present paper employs conceptual tools of critical cognitive discourse research and rhetorical studies to explore patterns of legitimization discourse used by top Polish political parties to claim state leadership in the years 2015–2023. The first part studies the discourse of Law & Justice, a far-right conservative party ruling Poland from October 2015 to October 2023. It describes L&J’s strategies of leadership legitimization involving socio-ideological polarization, strategic generation of internal as well as external conflict, threat construction and crisis management. The second part analyzes the more moderate and cooperation oriented discourse strategies implemented by three opposition parties in the lead-up to the 2023 parliamentary elections, in which L&J finally lost power. The aim of the paper is to compare and contrast the two discourses, L&J’s and the opposition’s, to speculate about the longevity of radical populist discourses such as L&J’s. It is argued that a conflict-charged, polarized populist discourse can be an extremely powerful tool, able to grant long-term political leadership. At the same time, in a yet longer perspective, such a discourse runs a considerable risk of ‘wearing out’ and becoming vulnerable to more forward-looking and pragmatic leadership rhetoric, which presages political change.
Bibliografia
Ansell, Chris, Arjen Boin & P. ‘t Hart. 2014. Political leadership in times of crisis. In R. A. Rhodes & P. ‘t Hart (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, 418–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Karlyn K. 2005. Agency: Promiscous and protean. Communication and Critical/ Cultural Studies 2: 1–19.
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cap, Piotr. 2022. The Discourse of Conflict and Crisis: Poland’s Political Rhetoric in the European Perspective. London: Bloomsbury.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul. 2010. From mind to grammar: Coordinate systems, prepositions, constructions. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (eds), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, 640–671. London: Equinox.
Chilton, Paul. 2011. Deictic Space Theory (DST): The fundamental theory and its applications. Paper presented at the 42nd Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań, May 1–3, 2011.
Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmides, Leda. 1989. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies within the Wason Selection Task. Cognition 31: 187–276.
Dunmire, Patricia. 2005. Preempting the future: Rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse. Discourse & Society 16: 481 513.
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans Vivien & Paul Chilton (eds). 2010. Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardulska, Alicja. 2024. Wybory wolne ale nieuczciwe? Wnioski z obywatelskiej kontroli. Gazeta Wyborcza, January 16, 2024. https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,30598401,wyborywolne-ale-nieuczciwe-wnioski-z-obywatelskiej-kontroli.html
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
Hart, Christopher. 2018. Cognitive linguistic critical discourse studies: Connecting language and image. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 141–159. London: Routledge.
Hayden, Jacqueline. 2020. Solidarity at 40: How the union that brought down communism became a conservative government ally. Notes from Poland, https://notesfrompoland.com/2020/08/28/solidarity-at-40-how-the-union-that-brought-down-communism-became-a-conservative-government-ally/
Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. 2018. Rhetorical agency: What enables and restrains the power of speech? In R. Heath & Ø. Ihlen (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication, 287–299. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ingram, David. 2014. Poverty knowledge, coercion, and social rights: A discourse ethical contribution to social epistemology. In D. T. Meyers (ed.), Poverty, Agency, and Human Rights, 43–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds.). 2019. Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mann, William & Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A theory of text organization. Text 8: 243–281.
Miller, Carolyn R. 2007. What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37: 137–157.
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
Musolff, Andreas. 2021. Researching political metaphor cross-culturally: English, Hungarian, Greek and Turkish L1-based interpretations of the Nation as Body metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics 183: 121–131.
Norris, Pippa & Ronald Inglehart. 2018. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oddo, John. 2018. The Discourse of Propaganda: Case Studies from the Persian Gulf War and the War on Terror. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Ridolfo, Jim & Danielle De Voss. 2009. Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13: 20–35.
Schmölz, Birgit. 2019. Misunderstanding, conflict and divisions between the Visegrad Group and the European Union – An analytical discourse beyond the public cliché of the migration crisis. CES Working Papers 11: 22–34.
Tomczak-Boczko, Justyna, Klaudia Gołębiowska & Maciej Górny. 2023. Who is a ‘true refugee’? Polish political discourse in 2021–2022. Discourse Studies 25: 799–822.
Tuomela, Raimo. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology – A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.),Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 63–94. London: Sage.
Wylęgalski, Adam. 2019. Solidarity-based versus liberal Poland: Jaroslaw Kaczynski’s discourse of thin-centered populism in the light of Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. MAthesis, University of Tartu.
Žagar, Igor. 2010. Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6: 3–27
