On ‘small’ structures in syntax: small clauses, nonsententials, and small nominals

Autor

  • Wiktor Pskit Uniwersytet Łódzki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2017.07.10

Słowa kluczowe:

small clause, small nominal, non-sentential, structure, syntax

Abstrakt

This paper is concerned with various dimensions of the ‘smallness’ of syntactic structures. Grammatical constructions selected to illustrate the apparent smallness in syntax include small clauses, nonsententials and small nominals. The ‘smallness’ of small clauses (e.g. We consider him very silly) has recently drawn the attention of researchers, leading to various accounts of their internal composition and derivation. As regards small nominals, they are discussed on the basis of Pereltsvaig [2006]. It is also proposed that NPN structures (e.g. day after day) constitute an instance of ‘small’ structure. Recent developments in syntactic theory (e.g. Citko 2008; Haïk 2013; Progovac et al. 2006; Travis 2001; Pskit 2012, 2015) demonstrate that behind the surface ‘smallness’ of the above-mentioned types of expressions there are complex syntactic mechanisms.

Bibliografia

Abney, S.P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., Stavrou, M. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Baker, M. 2013. On agreement and its relationship to case: some generative ideas and results. Lingua 130, 14-32.

Bošković, Ž. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In G. Grewendorf and T. E. Zimmermann (eds.) Discourse and grammar. From sentence types to lexical categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 179-242.

Bowers, J. 2002. Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 183–224.

Carnie, A. 2008. Constituent Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, G., Rizzi, L. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In B. Heine and

H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxfrod University Press, 51–65.

Citko, B. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118: 261-295.

Citko, B. 2011. Symmetry in Syntax. Merge, Move, and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Embick, D., Noyer, R. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289-324.

Fortin, C. 2007. Some (not all) nonsententials are only a phase. Lingua 117: 67-94.

Haïk, I. 2013. Symmetric structures. Corela 11:1.

Halle, M., Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Heycock, C. 2013. The syntax of predication. In M. den Dikken (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 322-352.

Jackendoff, R. 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84(1): 8-28.

Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609- 665.

Pereltsvaig, A. 2006. Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 433–500.

Pereltsvaig, A. 2007. The universality of DP: a view from Russian. Studia Linguistica 61(1): 59-94.

Progovac, L. 1998. Determiner Phrase in a Language without Determiners. Journal of Linguistics 34: 165–179.

Progovac, L. 2006. The syntax of nonsententials. Small clauses and phrases at the root. In L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles and E. Barton (eds.) The Syntax of Nonsententials.Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33-71.

Pskit, W. 2012. The English NPN forms: words or constructions?. In W. Skrzypczak, T. Fojt, S. Wacewicz (eds.) Exploring Language through Contrast. Cambridge Scholars Publishing,126-144.

Pskit, W. 2015. The categorial status and internal structure of NPN forms in English and Polish. In A. Bondaruk and A. Prażmowska (eds.) Within Language. Beyond Theories. Vol. 1. Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 27-42.

Pskit, W. 2017. Linguistic and philosophical approaches to NPN structures. In W. Pskit (ed.) Topics in Syntax and Semantics. Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 93-110.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G, and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.

Radford, A. 200. NP shells. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 33, 2-20.

Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337. 27. Rizzi, L. 2013. The functional structure of the sentence, and cartography. In M. den Dikken (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 425-457.

Travis, L. 2001. The syntax of reduplication. Proceedings of NELS 31: 455-69.

Willim, E. 1998. On the DP-hypothesis in Polish, an article-less language. In P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.) Projections and Mapping: Studies in Syntax. Lublin: Folium, 137-158.

Willim, E. 2000. On the Grammar of Polish Nominals. In R. Martin et al. (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 319–346.

Opublikowane

2017-12-01

Numer

Dział

Językoznawstwo

Jak cytować

On ‘small’ structures in syntax: small clauses, nonsententials, and small nominals. (2017). Heteroglossia – Studia Kulturoznawczo-Filologiczne, 7, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2017.07.10