Can Critical Discourse Studies Benefit from the Legitimization-via-Proximization Approach?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34767/HG.2014.04.04Keywords:
Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), cognitive pragmatics, proximization theory, public space discourses, policy legitimizationAbstract
The goal of this paper is to show how proximization theory, a recent cognitive-pragmatic model of crisis and threat construction, can be applied in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS). It is argued that the rapidly growing, intergeneric field of CDS is in need of new, interdisciplinary methodologies that will allow it to account for an increasingly broader spectrum of discourses, genres and thematic domains. Thus, proximization theory is used as a candidate methodological tool to handle three sample discourses – health, environment, modern technology – with a view to further applications. The results seem promising: the theory elucidates well the key features of public discourses within the CDS scope, for instance legitimization patterns in policy communication. Equally promising seem the prospects for proximization theory itself to continue to draw empirically from the expanding CDS territory.
References
Bacevich, Andrew. 2010. Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-Driven Approach”. Text & Talk 26: 635-660.
Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bell, Allan and Garrett, Peter (eds). 1998. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berglez, Peter and Olausson, Ulrika. 2010. “The ‘Climate Threat’ as Ideology: Interrelations between Citizen and Media Discourses”. Paper presented at the conference Communicating Climate Change II – Global Goes Regional. University of Hamburg.
Boykoff, Maxwell. 2008. “The Cultural Politics of Climate Change Discourse in UK Tabloids”. Political Geography 27: 549-569.
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17-41.
Cap, Piotr. 2010. “Axiological Aspects of Proximization”. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392-407.
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul. 2005a. “Discourse Space Theory: Geometry, Brain and Shifting Viewpoints”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 78-116.
Chilton, Paul. 2005b. “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct”. In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds), 19-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chilton, Paul. 2010. “From Mind to Grammar: Coordinate Systems, Prepositions, Constructions”. In Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, Vyvyan Evans and Paul Chilton (eds), 640-671. London: Equinox.
Chilton, Paul. 2011. “Still Something Missing in CDA”. Discourse Studies 13: 769-781.
Chovanec, Jan. 2010. “Legitimation through Differentiation: Discursive Construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an Opponent to Military Action”. In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, Urszula Okulska and Piotr Cap (eds), 61-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cienki, Alan, Kaal, Bertie and Maks, Isa. 2010. “Mapping World View in Political Texts Using Discourse Space Theory: Metaphor as an Analytical Tool”. Paper presented at RaAM 8 conference, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Dirven, Rene, Polzenhagen, Frank and Wolf, Hans-Georg. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology and Critical Discourse Analysis”. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 1222-1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Filardo Llamas, Laura. 2010. “Discourse Worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement”. In Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution. Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, Katy Hayward and Catherine O’Donnell (eds), 62-76. London: Routledge.
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Graham, Stephen. 2004. “War in the ‘Weirdly Pervious World’: Infrastructure, Demodernisation, and Geopolitics”. Paper presented at the conference on Urban Vulnerability and Network Failure. University of Salford, UK.
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation”. In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hart, Christopher and Cap, Piotr (eds). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. (forthcoming)
Jowett, Garth S. and O’Donnell, Victoria. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kaplan, Lawrence and Kristol, William. 2003. The War over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Mission. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.
Koller, Veronika. 2008. Lesbian Discourses: Images of A Community. London: Routledge.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2009. “Europe in Crisis: Discourses on Crisis-events in the European Press 1956-2006”. Journalism Studies 10: 18-35.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Litosseliti, Lia and Sunderland, Jane (eds). 2002. Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Montgomery, Martin. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
Morrish, Elizabeth and Sauntson, Helen. 2007. New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Okulska, Urszula and Cap, Piotr (eds). 2010. Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reisigl Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, John. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandwell, Barry. 2006. “Monsters in Cyberspace: Cyberphobia and Cultural Panic in the Information Age”. Information, Communication & Society 9: 39-61.
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silberstein, Sandra. 2004. War of Words. London: Routledge.
Sontag, Susan. 1978. Illness as Metaphor. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1987. Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. London: Sage.
Van Rijn-van Tongeren, Geraldine. 1997. Metaphors in Medical Texts. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Verhagen, Arie. 2007. “Construal and Perspectivization”. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 48-81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verton, Dan. 2003. Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyberterrorism. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, Ruth. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis (4 volumes). London: Sage.
