The need for new security architecture in Europe

Authors

  • Radoslava Brhlíková University in Nitra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2022.01.07

Keywords:

peace, international security, security guarantees, Russia, USA, new security architecture, 21st century

Abstract

The paper discusses Russia’s position towards present day escalation of tensions in international relations and international security which may lead to the new conflict in Europe. It analyses and evaluates Russian proposals, positions and deals with the negotiations between Russia and USA that have taken place in this regard. The paper summarizes the historical facts that led to today’s escalation of tensions between Russia, the USA and Europe, and underlines the fact that dialogue requires two parties willing to listen to each other,capable of perception, which must approach it without prejudice and hegemonic, neo-colonial superiority. The paper is based on the assumption that the security architecture of 20th century Europe has collapsed and disappeared. Russia is coming up with proposals to redefine it, but the West is unable to do so because of neo-colonial superiority and arrogance and refuses to discuss it, blindly adhering to the status quo of the Cold War. That is the reason why even the Member States of the EU are not able to create real common security policy. But Europe and the world need new security architecture.

References

Doyle, M.W. (2011). Liberal Peace: Selected Essays. New York: Routledge.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

Guzzini, S. (1998). Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy.

The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.

Hiro, D. (2009). After Empire. The birth of a multipolar world. New York: Nation Books.

Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Jarvis, R. & Gavin, F. & Rovner, J. & Labrosse, D. (eds.) (2018). Chaos in the Liberal order: the Trump Presidency and International Politics in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Columbia University Press.

Krejčí, O. (2001). Mezinárodní politika (International Politics). Praha: Ekopress.

Krejčí, O. (2017). Geopolitika Ruska (Geopolitics of Russia). Praha: Professional Publishing, s. r. o.

Layne, C. (2006). The Unipolar Illusion Revisited. The Coming End of the United States´ Unipolar Moment. International Security, 31(2), 7–14.

McCoy, A.W. (2017). In the Shadows of the American Century. The Rise and Decline of US Global Power. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

Morgenthau, H. (1985). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th ed. New York: Knopf.

Nye, J.S. jr. (2015). Is the American Century Over? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Shifrinson Itzkowitz, J.R. (2016). Deal or No Deal? The End of the Cold War and the U.S. Offer to Limit NATO Expansion. International Security, 40(4), 7–44. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00236.

Temple, H.J., 3rd Viscount Palmerston (1848). TREATY OF ADRIANOPLE—CHARGES AGAINST VISCOUNT PALMERSTON, vol. 97 cc 66–123.

Zakaria, F. (2019). The Self-destruction of American Power: Washington Squandered the Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, 98(4).

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

Issue

Section

Studies and analysis

How to Cite

The need for new security architecture in Europe. (2022). World of Ideas and Politics, 21(1), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2022.01.07