The use of stock photos in news reporting: A case in 2022 of the Russo-Ukrainian War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2023.02.04Keywords:
clickbait, credibility, media manipulation, misleading news, sensationalism, truthAbstract
The ability to transmit accurate information that does not deceive its readership, and the use of images that reflects the truth of the fact that they are supposed to be representing, should be an important principle and basal tenet of any traditional or social media-based news or journalistic organization or platform. It is not uncommon to find images or photos that accompany the text of a news article, and the visual impact of an image, as is often expressed in a cliché, can sometimes add much more value than merely the text itself. Whereas some fake news is patently untrue, another gray zone of journalism that is affected by fake news may encompass bias, spin and deceit. Absent rigorous quality control and editing measures, a news source may inadvertently slip into this gray zone, which encompasses the use of stock photos to represent, or supplement, the text of news items. Focusing on photos by a pro-Ukrainian social media app-based news media outlet, this rather unusual case involves a highly topical personality, the President of Ukraine. This article points to how subtle “truth” can change through the use (or abuse) of stock photos. Several images covering May-September of 2022, specifically photos or videos of an unshaven President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in military attire that switch to images of a shaven individual in a suit, and back again, are examined from a single Telegram-based news source. This case notes, using a “soft” example, the risks of “massaging” truth using stock photos. In times of war, especially in the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War, the accuracy of news, including the non-fictional imagery that accompanies it, is essential, so as to neither mislead nor bias the readership, and to portray the news as accurately and neutrally as possible.
References
Arielli, E. (2019). The polarized image: Between visual fake news and “emblematic evidence”. In: C.P. Martins & P.T. Magalhães (eds.), Politics and Image (pp. 23–35). Coimbra: IEF Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos, Universidade de Coimbra.
Babacan, K., & Tam, M.S. (2022). The information warfare role of social media: Fake news in the Russia-Ukraine War. Journal of Erciyes Communication, 9(3), 75–92.DOI: 10.17680/erciyesiletisim.113790.
Billard, T.J., & Moran, R.E. (2023). Designing trust: Design style, political ideology, and trust in “fake” news websites. Digital Journalism, 11(3), 519–546. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2087098.
Boididou, C., Papadopoulos, S., Zampoglou, M., Apostolidis, L., Papadopoulou, O., & Kompatsiaris, Y. (2018). Detection and visualization of misleading content on Twitter. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 7(1), 71–86. DOI: 10.1007/s13735-017-0143-x.
Cao, J., Qi, P., Sheng, Q., Yang, T-Y., Guo, J-B., & Li, J-T. (2020). Exploring the role of visual content in fake news detection. In: K. Shu, S-H. Wang, D-W. Lee, & H. Liu, (eds.), Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News in Social Media. Lecture Notes in Social Networks (pp. 141–161). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_8.
Dootson, P., Thomson, T.J., Angus, D., Miller, S., Hurcombe, E., & Smith, A. (2021). Managing problematic visual media in natural hazard emergencies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59, 102249. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102249.
Greene, C.M., Bradshaw, R., Huston, C., & Murphy, G. (2022). The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 28(4), 677–693. DOI: 10.1037/xap0000364.
Hendricks, V.F., & Vestergaard, M. (2019). Alternative facts, misinformation, and fake news. In: V.F. Hendriks & M. Vestergaard, Reality Lost (pp. 49–77). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00813-0_4.
Krawczyk, P., & Wiśnicki, J. (2022). Information warfare tools and techniques in the context of information operations conducted by the Russian Federation during the 2022 war in Ukraine. Cybersecurity and Law, 8(2), 278–286. DOI: 10.35467/cal/157216.
Levitskaya, A., & Fedorov, A. (2020). Typology and mechanisms of media manipulation. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 5(1), 69–78. DOI: 10.13187/ijmil.2020.1.69.
Mortensen, T.M., McDermott, B.P., & Ejaz, K. (2023). Measuring photo credibility in journalistic contexts: Scale development and application to staff and stock photography.Journalism Practice, 17(6), 1158–1177. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2021.1976073.
Msughter, A.E., & YarAdua, S.M. (2022). Influence of digital images on the propagation of fake news on Twitter in Russia and Ukraine crisis. SSRN (preprint, not peer reviewed) 20 pp. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4062502.
Murphy, K.M. (2023). Fake news and the web of plausibility. Social Media + Society, 9(2), in press. DOI: 10.1177/20563051231170606.
Nabiullina, V. (2021). Public dissemination of knowingly false information: Criminal and criminological aspects. In: G. Shkabin, U. Helmann & V. Lezer (eds.), Proceedings of the VII International Scientific-Practical Conference “Criminal Law and Operative Search Activities: Problems of Legislation, Science and Practice” (CLOSA 2021)( pp. 70–74). Setúbal: Science and Technology Publications. DOI: 10.5220/0010629000003152.
Narwal, B. (2018). Fake news in digital media. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN2018) (pp. 977–981).DOI: 10.1109/ICACCCN.2018.8748586.
Newman, E.J. & Zhang, L. (2020). Truthiness: How nonprobative photos shape belief. In: R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E.J. Newman & N. Schwarz (eds.), The Psychology of Fake News: Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation (pp. 90–114). London: Routledge.DOI: 10.4324/9780429295379.
Otrel-Cass, K., & Fasching, M. (2021). Postdigital truths: Educational reflections on fake news and digital identities. In: M. Savin-Baden (ed.), Postdigital Humans. Postdigital Science and Education (pp. 89–108). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65592-1_6.
Pavlik, J.V., Alsaad, A.A., & Laufer, P. (2020). Speaking truth to power: Core principles for advancing international journalism education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 392–406. DOI: 10.1177/1077695820946241.
Raj, C., & Meel, P. (2022). People lie, actions don’t! Modeling infodemic proliferation predictors among social media users. Technology in Society, 68, 101930. DOI: 10.1016/j. techsoc.2022.101930.
Ross Arguedas, A.A., Badrinathan, S., Mont’Alverne, C., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R.K. (2023). Shortcuts to trust: Relying on cues to judge online news from unfamiliar sources on digital platforms. Journalism, (in press). DOI: 10.1177/14648849231194485.
Salminen, J., Jung, S-G., Santos, J.M., & Jansen, B.J. (2020). Does a smile matter if the person is not real?: The effect of a smile and stock photos on persona perceptions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 568–590. DOI: 10.1080/104 47318.2019.1664068.
Simonsen, A.H. (2022). The future in our hands: A sustainable stock photo reading. Journal of Environmental Media, 3, 133–137. DOI: 10.1386/jem_00076_1.
Toma, G-A., & Scripcariu, A-G. (2020). Misinformation ecosystems: A typology of fake news. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 11(2), 65–82.
Trninić, D., Kuprešanin Vukelić, A., & Bokan, J. (2022). Perception of “fake news” and potentially manipulative content in digital media — a generational approach. Societies, 12, 3. DOI: 10.3390/soc12010003.
Vultee, F., Burgess, G.S., Frazier, D., & Mesmer, K. (2022). Here’s what to know about clickbait: Effects of image, headline and editing on audience attitudes. Journalism Practice,16(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1793379.
Xu, W-Q., & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (2021). Communication officers in local authorities meeting social media: On the production of social media photos of older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 58, 100952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100952.
