The use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of the fit competences and personality of employees to the labor market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34767/SIMIS.2026.01.09Keywords:
intelligence, machine learning, optimization, objectification, feature analysisAbstract
This article discusses the development of artificial intelligence methods for analyzing the match between employee competencies and personality traits and labor market requirements. The authors point out that machine learning algorithms enable the processing of large datasets from CVs, professional profiles, and job advertisements, enabling more precise skill mapping. Particular attention is paid to analyzing the fit between personality and organizational culture using psychometric tools supported by predictive algorithms. The review of research shows that AI systems can increase the accuracy of candidate selection and reduce recruitment time and costs. At the same time, the authors emphasize the risk of replicating biases present in training data and the problem of transparency in decision-making models. The article also discusses ethical and legal issues related to personal data protection and the need to ensure transparency in recruitment processes. The review indicates that properly designed AI systems can support more objective and effective matching of employees to the labor market, provided that rigorous methodological and ethical standards are applied.
References
Amiresmaili M, Mehrolhassani MH, Iranmanesh M. The role of external factors in shaping the supply and demand of general practitioners in Iran: a qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2025; 27(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-03123-2.
Corfmat M, Martineau JT, Régis C. High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare. BMC Med Ethics. 2025; 26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.
Fukumura YE, Gray JM, Lucas GM, Becerik-Gerber B, Roll SC. Worker Perspectives on Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Office Workspaces: Implications for the Future of Office Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4):1690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041690.
Howard J. Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. Am J Ind Med. 2019; 62(11):917-926. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23037.
Jetha A, Shamaee A, Bonaccio S, Gignac MAM, Tucker LB, Tompa E, Bültmann U, Norman CD, Banks CG, Smith PM. Fragmentation in the future of work: A horizon scan examining the impact of the changing nature of work on workers experiencing vulnerability. Am J Ind Med. 2021; 64(8):649-666. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23262.
Kim D, Kim T, Kim W, Youn H. When automation hits jobs: Entrepreneurship as an alternative career path. PLoS One. 2025; 20(9):e0331244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331244.
Komeili M, Pou-Prom C, Liaqat D, Fraser KC, Yancheva M, Rudzicz F. Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0212342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212342. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0216375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216375.
Nguyen M, Nham TP, Alghafes R, Gupta B, Szabó-Szentgróti G. Psychological foundations of ambiguity in the hybrid workplace: The role of managerial risk-taking and AI-induced job insecurity. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2026; 262:106182. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106182.
Nguyen M, Nham TP, Alghafes R, Rahman O, Imre G. Human-GenAI-based agent collaboration: How employee perceptions shape knowledge sharing, thriving, and well-being. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2026 263:106271. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106271.
Wei F, Samad S, Rahman KU. Digital dialogue and creative outcomes: Unpacking AI-focused supervisory communication. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025; 260:105534. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105534.
Ying Y, Jin S. Artificial intelligence and green product innovation: Moderating effect of organizational capital. Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28572. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28572.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.