Temporal dynamics of e-petitions to the UK parliament 2015-2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2025.02.01Keywords:
petition, politics, parliament, temporality, diachronyAbstract
The tradition of petitioning authorities for redress of grievances can be traced back in England to the 14th century and was completed at the turn of the 21st century in the UK by the introduction of online systems which have proved extremely popular. However, no diachronic study has been conducted so far to precisely appraise this popularity during the premierships of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson between 2015 and 2022. The first objective of this paper is thus to explore data pertaining to over 100,000 petitions submitted to the UK Parliament over this period to map petition submission numbers over time, analyse the evolution of the system and probe the factors which may influence trends in submissions. The second part of the article focuses on the volume of signatures achieved by petitions and the dynamics of petition signing. The main goal is to determine whether a petition’s fate is set in the hours following its opening to the public. The analysis relies on a triangulation methodology, combining insight from data mining, data visualisation, close reading and statistics in order to build a web of evidence supporting the results being offered.
References
Barats, C., Dister, A., Gambette, P., Leblanc, J.-M., & Pérès, M. (2016). Analyser des pétitions en ligne : Potentialités et limites d’un dispositif d’étude pluridisciplinaire. JADT, 772–781.
Bochel, C. (2020). Petitions systems: Outcomes, “success” and “failure.” Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy045
Böhle, K., & Riehm, U. (2013, June 8). E-petition systems and political participation: About institutional challenges and democratic opportunities. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i7.4220
Briassoulis, H. (2021). Becoming E-Petition: An Assemblage-Based Framework for Analysis and Research. SAGE Open, 11(1), 21582440211001354. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211001354
Bright, J., Pilet, J.-B., Soubiran, T., Bermudez, S., & Libbrecht, L. (2020). Origines et impacts des hyper-utilisateurs et hyper-utilisatrices en cyberdémocratie. Le cas du pétitionnement en ligne. Participations, 28(3), 125–149.
Cabonce, A.B., Cago, F.J., Cornelio, C.J., & Cudiamat, S.L.E. (2019). Pa-Fansign please!: An experiment on the effects of the presentation of social causes in acquiring support in online petitions. Communication Research International Conference. Quezon City.
Carman, C. (2006, October 30). Assessment of the Scottish Parliament’s public petitions system, 1999–2006. Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.
Carpenter, D. (2016). Recruitment by petition: American antislavery, French Protestantism, English suppression. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 700–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001134
Christensen, H.S. (2011, February 2). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336
Clark, S.D., & Lomax, N. (2020). Linguistic and semantic factors in government e-petitions: A comparison between the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101523
Cruickshank, P., Smith, C., & Edelmann, N. (2010). Signing an e-petition as a transition from lurking to participation. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation Conference. Lausanne.
Girvin, C. (2018, November 19). Full of sound and fury: Is Westminster’s e-petitioning system good for democracy? Democratic Audit Blog. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.democraticaudit.com
Hagen, L., Uzuner, Ö., Kotfila, C., Harrison, T.M., & Lamanna, D. (2015). Understanding Citizens’ Direct Policy Suggestions to the Federal Government: A Natural Language Processing and Topic Modeling Approach. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2134–2143. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.257
Hale, S., Margetts, H., & Yasseri, T. (2012, March 28). Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street website. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference, WebSci 2013.
Halpin, D., Vromen, A., Vaughan, M., & Raissi, M. (2018). Online petitioning and politics: the development of Change.org in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2018.1499010
Hitlin, P. (2016, December 28). “We the people”: Five years of online petitions. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/12/28/we-the-people-five-years-of-online-petitions/ (accessed: 12.12.2025).
Horstink, L. (2017). Online Participation and the New Global Democracy: Avaaz, a Case Study. Global Society, 31(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552
Hough, R. (2012, December 1). Do Legislative Petitions Systems Enhance the Relationship Between Parliament and Citizen? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(3–4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706057
House of Commons Information Office (2010). Factsheet P7 Public Petitions. August.
Huang, H.-Y., Kovacs, M., Kryssanov, V., & Serdült, U. (2021). Towards a Model of Online Petition Signing Dynamics on the Join Platform in Taiwan. 2021 Eighth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG52154.2021.9530852
Huzzey, R., & Miller, H. (2020). Petitions, parliament and political culture: Petitioning the House of Commons, 1780–1918. Past & Present, 248(1), 123–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz061
Jouёt, J., & Le Caroff, C. (2013). L’observation ethnographique en ligne. In: C. Barats (Éd.), Analyser le web en sciences humaines et sociales (pp. 147–165). Paris: Armand Colin. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.barat.2013.01.0147
Lee, C.-P., Chen, D.-Y., & Huang, T.-Y. (2014). The Interplay Between Digital and Political Divides: The Case of e-Petitioning in Taiwan. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313497470
Leston-Bandeira, C. (2019). Parliamentary petitions and public engagement: an empirical analysis of the role of e-petitions. Policy & Politics, 47(3), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420117
Lindner, R., & Riehm, U. (2011). Broadening Participation Through E-Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1083
Macintosh, A., Malina, A., & Farrell, S. (2002). Digital Democracy Through Electronic Petitioning. In: W. J. McIver & A.K. Elmagarmid (eds.), Advances in Digital Government: Technology, Human Factors, and Policy (pp. 137–148). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b116295
Matthews, F. (2021). The value of ‘between-election’ political participation: Do parliamentary e-petitions matter to political elites? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120959041
McKinnell, C. (2020, August 27). How is the Petitions Committee representing the public amid the procedural and practical restrictions of the Covid crisis? Hansard Society Blog. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/how-petitions-committee-representing-public-amid-procedural-practical-covid-restrictions (accessed: 21.11.2025).
Morva, O. (2016, April). Are E-Petitions Operative for Change? On the Effectiveness and the Transformative Potential of E-Petitioning. Proceedings of International Academic Conferences, 3505977. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
Palmieri, S.A. (2008). Petition Effectiveness: Improving Citizens’ Direct Access to Parliament. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 23(1), 121–135.
Puschmann, C., Bastos, M.T., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2017). Birds of a feather petition together? Characterizing e-petitioning through the lens of platform data. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1162828
Riehm, U., Böhle, K., & Lindner, R. (2014). Electronic petitioning and modernization of petitioning systems in Europe (Technology Assessment Studies, Série 6). Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag (TAB). https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000137567
Sheppard, J. (2015). Online petitions in Australia: Information, opportunity and gender. Australian Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2015.1049512
UK Parliament – Petitions Committee (2016, November 17). Your petitions: Lee Booth’s story. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/326/petitions-committee/news/99237/your-petitions-lee-booths-story (accessed : 24.11.2025).
Wright, S. (2016). ‘Success’ and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1080285
Yasseri, T., Hale, S.A., & Margetts, H.Z. (2013, January 3). Modeling the rise in internet-based petitions. arXiv:1308.0239v4 [Physics]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0239
Yasseri, T., Hale, S.A., & Margetts, H.Z. (2017). Rapid rise and decay in petition signing. EPJ Data Science, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0116-6
Zadra, M. (2020). Do Central Government e-Democracy Reforms Work for Mid-Size Municipalities? A Case Study of the Long-Term Effects of e-Petitioning in Southampton. 14th ECPR General Conference. Online.
