Environmental convergence: from the theory to practice

Authors

  • Perga Tatiana Yurievna Ukraińska Akademia Nauk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2015.14.16

Keywords:

ecological convergence, neoconvergence, international envi-ronmental policy, cohesion.

Abstract

Impending environmental disaster due to increased human and industrial environmental pressures force states to bring together their positions and policies to protect it, which leads to the develop-ment of environmental convergence. This mechanism is the basis for the formation of national and global environmental policy. It is essential to study the fundamental trends, directions and forms in terms of ped. cting global development in the fi rst half of the twenty-fi rst century. Based on the analysis of ecological theory of convergence and the latest trends of international cooperation, concludes a new phase of convergence of states, which is inherent old and gain new forms of international coop-eration. We introduce the concept of neo-convergence, as a new form of states rapprochement. The benefi ts for diff erent groups of countries in participating in the environmental convergence, their progress towards convergence and policies in the environmental fi eld (2004 – 2014) and main problems of evaluation systems that process are shown and ana-lysed.

References

Barrios S., Holger G., Strobl E.A., Multinational Enterprises and New Trade Theory: Evidence for the Convergence Hypothesis, “Open Economies Review” 2003, No. 14 (4).

Bennett C., What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?, “British Journal of Political Science” 1991, No. 21 (2).

Bennett C., Diff erent processes, one result. The convergence of data protection policy in Europe and the United States,“Governance” 1988, No. 1.

Botcheva L., Martin L.L., Institutional eff ects on state behaviour. Convergence and divergence, “International Studies Quarterly” 2001, No. 45.

Busch P., Jörgens H., International patterns of environmental policy change and convergence, “European Environment” 2005, No. 15(2).

Busch P., Jörgens H., Tews K. The global diff usion of regulatory instruments: the making of a new international environmental regime, “The Annals of the American Political Science Association” 2005, No. 598 (1).

Busch P., Jörgens H., The international sources of policy convergence: explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations, “Journal of European Public Policy” Special Issue: Cross-national Policy Convergence: Causes, Concepts and Empirical Findings 2005, Vol. 12, No. 5.

Busch P., Jörgens H., The international sources of policy convergence: explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2005, No. 12 (5).

Busch P., Jörgens H., Tews K., The diff usion of new environmental policy instruments, “European Journal of Political Research” 2003, Vol. 41 (2).

Busch P., Tews K., Governance by diff usion? Potentials and restrictions for environmental policy diff usion, [in:] Global environmental change and the nation state, eds. F. Biermann, R. Brohm, K. Dingwerth, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

Drezner D.W., Globalization and policy convergence, “The International Studies Review” 2001, No. 3.

Gilardi F., The international foundations of regulatory capitalism: the diff usion of independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe, “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 2005, No. 598.

Guler I., Guillen M., Macpherson J., Global competition, institutions and the diffusion of organizational practices. The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certifi cates, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2002, No. 47.

Heichel S., Pape J., Sommerer T., Is there convergence in convergence research? An overview of empirical studies on policy convergence, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2005, No. 12 (5).

Hoberg G., Globalization and policy convergence: symposium overview, “Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice” 2001, No. 3.

Holzinger K., Knill C., Arts B., Environmental Policy Convergence in Europe. The Impact of International Institutions and Trade, N.Y.–L.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Holzinger K., Knill C., Sommerer T., Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition, “International Organization” 2008, Vol. 62.

Holzinger K., Knil C., Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2005, No. 12.

Holzinger K., Knil C., Competition, cooperation and communication. A theoretical analysis of diff erent sources of environmental policy convergence and their interaction. Working Paper, Political Science Series No. 102, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

Humphreys P., Europeanisation, globalisation and telecommunications governance: a neo-Gramscian analysis, “Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies” 2002, No. 8.

Knill C., Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches and explanatory factors, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2005, No. 12 (5).

Simmons B.A., Elkins Z., The globalization of liberalization: policy diff usion in the international political economy, “American Political Science Review” 2004, No. 98.

Strang D., Meyer J., Institutional conditions for diff usion, “Theory and Society” 1993, No. 22.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-04

Issue

Section

Studies and analysis

How to Cite

Environmental convergence: from the theory to practice. (2022). World of Ideas and Politics, 14, 283-305. https://doi.org/10.34767/SIIP.2015.14.16